Read the illustration net.
Every one of these plans comes with a benefit illustration. The scenarios in it
are prescribed assumptions used for comparison — they are not forecasts, and
they are shown before the policy's own charges and the cost of the cover
attached to it. The only figure that tells you anything is the return on the
money you actually pay in, after all of that, over the full term.
We work that figure out with you, on paper, from the insurer's own illustration.
Ask for it in writing. Any adviser unwilling to put the net position on paper
has told you something without meaning to.
Then we show the other column: what a pure term policy would cost for the same
cover, and what the difference in premium would have to earn, invested
separately, to match the guarantee. Sometimes the savings plan wins — a
guarantee you will actually keep is worth more than a return you will abandon
in a bad year. Sometimes it does not. You should see both columns either way.
The comparison
The same money, two ways
Before you choose between a savings plan and term cover plus a separate
investment, these are the five lines we put side by side.
What we compare, in front of you
- The guaranteed maturity or income in rupees, against the total premiums you will pay
- The sum assured a pure term policy would buy for the same annual outlay
- What the difference in premium, invested separately, would need to earn to match the guarantee
- Liquidity — what happens if you stop paying in year three, and what you would get back
- The tax treatment of premium and payout under the rules as they stand when you buy
A worked example on the actual illustration for the plan you are shown.